Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:09

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sony Surprise PlayStation Fans With New Free PS5 Release - ComicBook.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Why did my ex move on so quickly?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Former church in Northern Kentucky now a heavenly home for sale - WWMT
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How short is too short for a skirt?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Can a Trump supporter explain what was wrong with what Bishop Budde said to Donald Trump?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.